logo

 

View abstract data
Title
P005 Prevalence of angle-closure disease in a Korean population: the Namil study report
Author
Lee, Joo Hwa, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, South-Korea(P)
Co-author(s)
Kim, Yong Yeon, Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South-Korea
The Korean Glaucoma Society, Department of Ophthalmology Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, South-Korea
Topic
1.1 General aspects: Epidemiology
Keywords
Purpose: To estimate the prevalence of primary angle-closure suspect (PACS), primary angle-closure (PAC), and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) in a Korean population as a part of the Namil Study.
Design: Population based epidemiological survey
Participants: 1,909 persons over 40 years of age residing in Namil district, Chungnam province, Korea, 1,539 persons participated in the study.
Methods: Each subject underwent full screening tests for the detection of glaucoma including an interview, Goldmann applanation tonometry, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, refraction, a van Herick test, fundus photography, corneal thickness measurement with ultrasound pachymetry, a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology, gonioscopy, and ocular biometry using IOL master. If the findings were suspicious or equivocal, visual field tests with Humphrey field analyzer as well as optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry were performed for confirmation of the diagnosis. A diagnosis of PACS (posterior trabecular meshwork not visible by gonioscopy in >3 quarters of the angle circumference), PAC (PACS plus elevated IOP, peripheral anterior synechiae, iris distortion, and/or glaukomflecken), or PACG (PAC plus optic nerve/visual field damage) was made based on the gonioscopy, optic disc appearance, perimetry, and imaging tests.
Main outcome measure: The prevalence of PACS, PAC and PACG were measured.
Results: Of 1,909 persons over 40 years of age residing in Namil district, Chungnam province, Korea, 1,539 persons participated in the study. Estimated prevalences of PACS, PAC, and PACG were 2.1%, 0.5% and 0.5% respectively.
Conclusions: Prevalences were 2.1%, 0.5%, and 0.5%, respectively, for PACS, PAC, and PACG in subjects over 40 years from Namil, Korea.
References: Dandona L, Dandona R, Mandal P, et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1710–6. Bourne RR, Sukudom P, Foster PJ, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in Thailand: a population based survey in Rom Klao district, Bangkok. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:1069 –74. Yamamoto T, Iwase A, Araie M, et al. The Tajimi Study report 2. Prevalence of primary angle closure and secondary glaucoma in a Japanese population. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1661–9. Vijaya L, George R, Arvind H, et al. Prevalence of angleclosure disease in a rural southern Indian population. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:403–9. Vijaya L, George R, Arvind H, et al. Prevalence of primary angle-closure disease in an urban south Indian population and comparison with a rural population. The Chennai Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:655-60.